By now you may have heard that Dennis Kucinich will investigate a narrow element of discrepencies in the 9/11 Report. Many 9/11 Truthiness seekers are celebrating excitedly about this but I think this will come back and hit them in the face.

Although Kucinich is a bit of a woo in some ways I don't think he will take the leap of credulousness and faux-logic required to subscribe to the 'inside job cult.' My guess is that he will uncover more Bush incompetence but won't be able or willing to present any L/MIHOP theory due to such theories being unworkable in any sense.

If this proves to be the case then this presents truthiness-seekers with a major problem. They all tend to be enthusiastic Kucinich supporters; for whatever reason, whether because he's seen as the 'leftist' choice in the Democratic Party, or like has been suggested that they will always back a candidate with no hope of winning to keep them devoid of any true political effort. Whatever the case, some truthers have conjectured whether (and in some cases, assumed) Kucinich and even Wes Clark are secret 'MIHOPers' but yet are just keeping it a secret to protect them against 'Bushco.'

If Kucinich is seen to publicly subscribe to what truthers call 'incompetence theory' then this will probably bring him the 'fuck you' backlash against anyone seen to not agree with the 9/11 Truthiness movement. This may range from 'Kucinich = BushCo shill' to 'Kucinich threatened by BFEE to stay silent.'

What does everyone else think?

Bookmark/Search this post with:

| | | | | | | | | |

procrastinate later's blog | printer friendly version